<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Trouble with OpenOffice.org</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marteydodoo.com/2006/10/18/the-trouble-with-openofficeorg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marteydodoo.com/2006/10/18/the-trouble-with-openofficeorg/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 02:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: MarteyDodoo.com &#187; Zero-Day Attack in Microsoft Word</title>
		<link>http://www.marteydodoo.com/2006/10/18/the-trouble-with-openofficeorg/#comment-19092</link>
		<dc:creator>MarteyDodoo.com &#187; Zero-Day Attack in Microsoft Word</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 03:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marteydodoo.com/2006/10/18/the-trouble-with-openofficeorg/#comment-19092</guid>
		<description>[...] Extreme caution could mean taking any number of actions before deciding to open an attached Word document, from running it through an antivirus program (which would currently be fruitless, as none of them have currently released definitions to detect such dangerous Word documents), to emailing the sender back to ensure that they actually sent the file in question (as opposed to a message sent by malware), to using an alternative program not affected by the vulnerability to open Word documents.  tags: security, vulnerability, zero day, Microsoft Word [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Extreme caution could mean taking any number of actions before deciding to open an attached Word document, from running it through an antivirus program (which would currently be fruitless, as none of them have currently released definitions to detect such dangerous Word documents), to emailing the sender back to ensure that they actually sent the file in question (as opposed to a message sent by malware), to using an alternative program not affected by the vulnerability to open Word documents.  tags: security, vulnerability, zero day, Microsoft Word [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christina</title>
		<link>http://www.marteydodoo.com/2006/10/18/the-trouble-with-openofficeorg/#comment-17734</link>
		<dc:creator>Christina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 00:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marteydodoo.com/2006/10/18/the-trouble-with-openofficeorg/#comment-17734</guid>
		<description>I think the problem is that OpenOffice tries to play catchup to MS Office instead of thinking about how to create a new, better environment. As a result, you just have second-rate features with weird names to avoid trademark suits that generally suck and are ugly.

I use OpenOffice for the principle of it, but it makes me hurt so much on the inside sometimes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the problem is that OpenOffice tries to play catchup to MS Office instead of thinking about how to create a new, better environment. As a result, you just have second-rate features with weird names to avoid trademark suits that generally suck and are ugly.</p>
<p>I use OpenOffice for the principle of it, but it makes me hurt so much on the inside sometimes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
